mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-07-02 06:23:18 +02:00
Standardize on using __func__ instead of __FUNCTION__
The __func__ variant is standardized in C99 and recommended to be used instead of __FUNCTION__ in the gcc info page. Only _very_ old versions of gcc did not know about __func__, but we've been using both __func__ and __FUNCTION__ for a long while now, and nobody complained about this, so all our users seem to use recent enough compilers. Corresponding to flashrom svn r711. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
This commit is contained in:
6
spi.c
6
spi.c
@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int probe_spi_rdid_generic(struct flashchip *flash, int bytes)
|
||||
id2 = (readarr[1] << 8) | readarr[2];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%02x, id2 0x%02x\n", __FUNCTION__, id1, id2);
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%02x, id2 0x%02x\n", __func__, id1, id2);
|
||||
|
||||
if (id1 == flash->manufacture_id && id2 == flash->model_id) {
|
||||
/* Print the status register to tell the
|
||||
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ int probe_spi_rems(struct flashchip *flash)
|
||||
id1 = readarr[0];
|
||||
id2 = readarr[1];
|
||||
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%x, id2 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, id1, id2);
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%x, id2 0x%x\n", __func__, id1, id2);
|
||||
|
||||
if (id1 == flash->manufacture_id && id2 == flash->model_id) {
|
||||
/* Print the status register to tell the
|
||||
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int probe_spi_res(struct flashchip *flash)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
id2 = readarr[0];
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, id2);
|
||||
printf_debug("%s: id 0x%x\n", __func__, id2);
|
||||
if (id2 != flash->model_id)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user