mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-06-30 21:52:36 +02:00
tests: Add tests to read from chip
Two tests cover the code which performs do_read operation. First one works with fake chip and dummy programmer. Fake chip has all operations defined, and a buffer to emulate chip memory. Second one uses the chip which is closer to the real one, because read/write/unlock/erase operations are real. The tests takes the advantage of dummyflasher's capability of emulating a W25Q128.V chip. BUG=b:181803212 TEST=builds and ninja test Change-Id: Ia57781ebc670c7bd6197e56fe8a20651a425c756 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/57326 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Nico Huber

parent
2d538d87eb
commit
1f62b8346e
97
tests/chip.c
97
tests/chip.c
@ -216,3 +216,100 @@ void erase_chip_with_dummyflasher_test_success(void **state)
|
||||
|
||||
free(param_dup);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void read_chip_test_success(void **state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
(void) state; /* unused */
|
||||
|
||||
struct flashchip chip = {
|
||||
.vendor = "aklm",
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Total size less than 16 to skip some steps
|
||||
* in flashrom.c#prepare_flash_access.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
.total_size = 8,
|
||||
.tested = TEST_OK_PREW,
|
||||
.read = read_chip,
|
||||
.write = write_chip,
|
||||
.unlock = unlock_chip,
|
||||
.block_erasers =
|
||||
{{
|
||||
/* All blocks within total size of the chip. */
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {2 * 1024, 4} },
|
||||
.block_erase = block_erase_chip,
|
||||
}},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct flashrom_flashctx flash = { 0 };
|
||||
struct flashrom_layout *layout;
|
||||
const char *param = ""; /* Default values for all params. */
|
||||
|
||||
setup_chip(&flash, &layout, &chip, param);
|
||||
|
||||
const char *const filename = "read_chip.test";
|
||||
|
||||
printf("Read chip operation started.\n");
|
||||
assert_int_equal(0, do_read(&flash, filename));
|
||||
printf("Read chip operation done.\n");
|
||||
|
||||
teardown(&layout);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void read_chip_with_dummyflasher_test_success(void **state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
(void) state; /* unused */
|
||||
|
||||
struct flashchip chip = {
|
||||
.vendor = "aklm&dummyflasher",
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Setup the values for W25Q128.V because we ask dummyflasher
|
||||
* to emulate this chip. All operations: read/write/unlock/erase
|
||||
* are real, not mocks, and they are expected to be handled by
|
||||
* dummyflasher.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
.total_size = 16 * 1024,
|
||||
.tested = TEST_OK_PREW,
|
||||
.read = spi_chip_read,
|
||||
.write = spi_chip_write_256,
|
||||
.unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect,
|
||||
.block_erasers =
|
||||
{
|
||||
{
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 4096} },
|
||||
.block_erase = spi_block_erase_20,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {32 * 1024, 512} },
|
||||
.block_erase = spi_block_erase_52,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 256} },
|
||||
.block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {16 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
|
||||
.block_erase = spi_block_erase_60,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
.eraseblocks = { {16 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
|
||||
.block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct flashrom_flashctx flash = { 0 };
|
||||
struct flashrom_layout *layout;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Dummyflasher is capable to emulate a chip, so we ask it to do this.
|
||||
* Nothing to mock, dummy is taking care of this already.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
char *param_dup = strdup("bus=spi,emulate=W25Q128FV");
|
||||
|
||||
setup_chip(&flash, &layout, &chip, param_dup);
|
||||
|
||||
const char *const filename = "read_chip.test";
|
||||
|
||||
printf("Read chip operation started.\n");
|
||||
assert_int_equal(0, do_read(&flash, filename));
|
||||
printf("Read chip operation done.\n");
|
||||
|
||||
teardown(&layout);
|
||||
|
||||
free(param_dup);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user