mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-07-02 06:23:18 +02:00
Unfortunately, EN29F002T, EN29F002AT, EN29F002ANT, EN29F002NT all have exactly the same ID
Improve model number printing. Add EN29F002(A)(N)B support while I'm at it. Corresponding to flashrom svn r172 and coreboot v2 svn r3031. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Markus Boas <bios@ryven.de>
This commit is contained in:
@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
|
||||
probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
|
||||
{"At49F002(N)T",ATMEL_ID, AT_49F002NT, 256, 256,
|
||||
probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
|
||||
/* The EN29F002AT can do byte program at arbitrary boundaries. */
|
||||
{"EN29F002AT", EON_ID, EN_29F002AT, 256, 256,
|
||||
{"EN29F002(A)(N)T", EON_ID, EN_29F002T, 256, 256,
|
||||
probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
|
||||
{"EN29F002(A)(N)B", EON_ID, EN_29F002B, 256, 256,
|
||||
probe_jedec, erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
|
||||
{"MBM29F400TC", FUJITSU_ID, MBM29F400TC_STRANGE, 512, 64 * 1024,
|
||||
probe_m29f400bt, erase_m29f400bt, write_linuxbios_m29f400bt},
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user