openwrt/flashrom
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-07-01 22:21:16 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Add support for ST M25P05/M25P10 chips that only respond to RES and not RDID

Browse Source 
Unfortunately, either the datasheets are wrong or both chips have
exactly the same ID.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r662.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
This commit is contained in:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-07-23 01:40:20 +00:00
parent f8555e24a4
commit 32961be12d
2 changed files with 40 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

38
flashchips.c
View File

@ -2249,6 +2249,27 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
.read = spi_chip_read,
},
/* The ST M25P05 is a bit of a problem. It has the same ID as the
* ST M25P05-A in RES mode, but supports only 128 byte writes instead
* of 256 byte writes. We rely heavily on the fact that probe_spi_res
* only is successful if RDID does not work.
*/
{
.vendor = "ST",
.name = "M25P05.RES",
.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_SPI,
.manufacture_id = ST_ID,
.model_id = ST_M25P05_RES,
.total_size = 64,
.page_size = 256,
.tested = TEST_UNTESTED,
.probe = probe_spi_res,
.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO,
.erase = spi_chip_erase_c7,
.write = spi_chip_write_1, /* 128 */
.read = spi_chip_read,
},
{
.vendor = "ST",
.name = "M25P10-A",
@ -2265,6 +2286,23 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
.read = spi_chip_read,
},
/* The ST M25P10 has the same problem as the M25P05. */
{
.vendor = "ST",
.name = "M25P10.RES",
.bustype = CHIP_BUSTYPE_SPI,
.manufacture_id = ST_ID,
.model_id = ST_M25P10_RES,
.total_size = 128,
.page_size = 256,
.tested = TEST_UNTESTED,
.probe = probe_spi_res,
.probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO,
.erase = spi_chip_erase_c7,
.write = spi_chip_write_1, /* 128 */
.read = spi_chip_read,
},
{
.vendor = "ST",
.name = "M25P20",