1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-07-02 14:33:18 +02:00

Various coding style and cosmetic changes

- Fix coding-style, whitespace, and indentation in a few places.

 - Consistently use the same spelling ("Super I/O") everywhere.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r933.

 - Make some flashrom stdout output look a bit nicer.
 
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
This commit is contained in:
Uwe Hermann
2010-03-13 17:28:29 +00:00
parent 645c6df21a
commit 439597032e
8 changed files with 79 additions and 82 deletions

View File

@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ int need_erase(uint8_t *have, uint8_t *want, int len, enum write_granularity gra
case write_gran_256bytes:
for (j = 0; j < len / 256; j++) {
limit = min (256, len - j * 256);
/* Are have and want identical? */
/* Are 'have' and 'want' identical? */
if (!memcmp(have + j * 256, want + j * 256, limit))
continue;
/* have needs to be in erased state. */
@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int selfcheck_eraseblocks(struct flashchip *flash)
* layouts. That would imply "magic" erase functions. The
* easiest way to check this is with function pointers.
*/
for (j = k + 1; j < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; j++)
for (j = k + 1; j < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; j++) {
if (eraser.block_erase ==
flash->block_erasers[j].block_erase) {
msg_gerr("ERROR: Flash chip %s erase function "
@ -1037,6 +1037,7 @@ int selfcheck_eraseblocks(struct flashchip *flash)
flash->name, k, j);
ret = 1;
}
}
}
return ret;
}
@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ void check_chip_supported(struct flashchip *flash)
"this flash part. Please include the flashrom\noutput "
"with the additional -V option for all operations you "
"tested (-V, -rV,\n-wV, -EV), and mention which "
"mainboard or programmer you tested. Thanks for your "
"mainboard or programmer you tested.\nThanks for your "
"help!\n===\n");
}
}