1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-29 07:53:44 +02:00

it85spi.c: Inline it85xx_spi_common_init()

Inline it85xx_spi_common_init() to single call site of
it85xx_spi_init() as the construction is a single phase
one. This allows for less cyclomatic complexity by
validating early and initialisation at the eulogy of the
one entry-point to the driver.

BUG=b:172876667
TEST=builds

Change-Id: Iac1b4ae9c6f34c5265e729ae0a80024800c3c272
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/48196
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Anastasia Klimchuk 2020-12-01 15:55:34 +11:00 committed by Edward O'Callaghan
parent 386cc556a4
commit 554a01f9a6

119
it85spi.c
View File

@ -291,82 +291,75 @@ static struct spi_master spi_master_it85xx = {
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
};
static int it85xx_spi_common_init(struct superio s)
int it85xx_spi_init(struct superio s)
{
chipaddr base;
struct it85spi_data *data;
unsigned int shm_io_base = 0;
struct it85spi_data *data = calloc(1, sizeof(struct it85spi_data));
msg_pdbg("%s():%d superio.vendor=0x%02x internal_buses_supported=0x%x\n",
__func__, __LINE__, s.vendor, internal_buses_supported);
/* Check for FWH because IT85 listens to FWH cycles.
* FIXME: The big question is whether FWH cycles are necessary
* for communication even if LPC_IO is defined.
*/
if (!(internal_buses_supported & BUS_FWH)) {
msg_pdbg("%s():%d buses not support FWH\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return 1;
}
msg_pdbg("Registering IT85 SPI.\n");
#ifdef LPC_IO
/* Get LPCPNP of SHM. That's big-endian. */
sio_write(s.port, LDNSEL, 0x0F); /* Set LDN to SHM (0x0F) */
shm_io_base = (sio_read(s.port, SHM_IO_BAR0) << 8) +
sio_read(s.port, SHM_IO_BAR1);
msg_pdbg("%s():%d shm_io_base=0x%04x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
shm_io_base);
/* These pointers are not used directly. They will be send to EC's
* register for indirect access. */
base = 0xFFFFF000;
/* pre-set indirect-access registers since in most of cases they are
* 0xFFFFxx00. */
INDIRECT_A0(shm_io_base, base & 0xFF);
INDIRECT_A2(shm_io_base, (base >> 16) & 0xFF);
INDIRECT_A3(shm_io_base, (base >> 24));
#endif
#ifdef LPC_MEMORY
/* FIXME: We should block accessing that region for anything else.
* Major TODO here, and it will be a lot of work.
*/
base = physmap("it85 communication", 0xFFFFF000, 0x1000);
if (base == ERROR_PTR)
return 1;
msg_pdbg("%s():%d base=0x%08x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
(unsigned int)base);
#endif
data = calloc(1, sizeof(struct it85spi_data));
if (!data) {
msg_perr("Unable to allocate space for extra SPI master data.\n");
return SPI_GENERIC_ERROR;
}
spi_master_it85xx.data = data;
msg_pdbg("%s():%d superio.vendor=0x%02x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
s.vendor);
#ifdef LPC_IO
data->shm_io_base = shm_io_base;
#endif
data->ce_high = ((unsigned char *)base) + 0xE00; /* 0xFFFFFE00 */
data->ce_low = ((unsigned char *)base) + 0xD00; /* 0xFFFFFD00 */
if (register_shutdown(it85xx_shutdown, data)) {
free(data);
return 1;
}
#ifdef LPC_IO
/* Get LPCPNP of SHM. That's big-endian. */
sio_write(s.port, LDNSEL, 0x0F); /* Set LDN to SHM (0x0F) */
data->shm_io_base = (sio_read(s.port, SHM_IO_BAR0) << 8) +
sio_read(s.port, SHM_IO_BAR1);
msg_pdbg("%s():%d it85spi_data->shm_io_base=0x%04x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
data->shm_io_base);
spi_master_it85xx.data = data;
/* These pointers are not used directly. They will be send to EC's
* register for indirect access. */
base = 0xFFFFF000;
data->ce_high = ((unsigned char *)base) + 0xE00; /* 0xFFFFFE00 */
data->ce_low = ((unsigned char *)base) + 0xD00; /* 0xFFFFFD00 */
/* pre-set indirect-access registers since in most of cases they are
* 0xFFFFxx00. */
INDIRECT_A0(data->shm_io_base, base & 0xFF);
INDIRECT_A2(data->shm_io_base, (base >> 16) & 0xFF);
INDIRECT_A3(data->shm_io_base, (base >> 24));
#endif
#ifdef LPC_MEMORY
/* FIXME: We should block accessing that region for anything else.
* Major TODO here, and it will be a lot of work.
*/
base = (chipaddr)physmap("it85 communication", 0xFFFFF000, 0x1000);
if (base == (chipaddr)ERROR_PTR)
return 1;
msg_pdbg("%s():%d base=0x%08x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
(unsigned int)base);
data->ce_high = (unsigned char *)(base + 0xE00); /* 0xFFFFFE00 */
data->ce_low = (unsigned char *)(base + 0xD00); /* 0xFFFFFD00 */
#endif
return 0;
}
int it85xx_spi_init(struct superio s)
{
int ret;
if (!(internal_buses_supported & BUS_FWH)) {
msg_pdbg("%s():%d buses not support FWH\n", __func__, __LINE__);
return 1;
}
ret = it85xx_spi_common_init(s);
msg_pdbg("FWH: %s():%d ret=%d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
if (!ret) {
msg_pdbg("%s: internal_buses_supported=0x%x\n", __func__,
internal_buses_supported);
/* Check for FWH because IT85 listens to FWH cycles.
* FIXME: The big question is whether FWH cycles are necessary
* for communication even if LPC_IO is defined.
*/
if (internal_buses_supported & BUS_FWH)
msg_pdbg("Registering IT85 SPI.\n");
/* FIXME: Really leave FWH enabled? We can't use this region
* anymore since accessing it would mess up IT85 communication.
* If we decide to disable FWH for this region, we should print
@ -374,8 +367,8 @@ int it85xx_spi_init(struct superio s)
*/
/* Set this as SPI controller. */
register_spi_master(&spi_master_it85xx);
}
return ret;
return 0;
}
#endif