mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-28 15:33:42 +02:00
Try RES even if RDID fails
The existing check in probe_spi_res() was right for SPI controllers which support all commands, but may not exist. For controllers which support only a subset of commands, it will fail in unexpected ways. Even if a command is supported by the controller, it may be unavailable if the controller is locked down. The new logic checks if RDID could be issued and its return values made sense (not 0xff 0xff 0xff). In that case, RES probing is not performed. Otherwise, we try RES. There is one drawback: If RDID returned unexpected values, we don't issue a RES probe. However, in that case we should try to match RDID anyway. Corresponding to flashrom svn r348 and coreboot v2 svn r3774. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: FENG yu ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebaffb6e51
commit
92a54ca030
12
spi.c
12
spi.c
@ -160,13 +160,11 @@ int probe_spi_res(struct flashchip *flash)
|
||||
unsigned char readarr[3];
|
||||
uint32_t model_id;
|
||||
|
||||
if (spi_rdid(readarr, 3))
|
||||
/* We couldn't issue RDID, it's pointless to try RES. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check if RDID returns 0xff 0xff 0xff, then we use RES. */
|
||||
if ((readarr[0] != 0xff) || (readarr[1] != 0xff) ||
|
||||
(readarr[2] != 0xff))
|
||||
/* Check if RDID was successful and did not return 0xff 0xff 0xff.
|
||||
* In that case, RES is pointless.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!spi_rdid(readarr, 3) && ((readarr[0] != 0xff) ||
|
||||
(readarr[1] != 0xff) || (readarr[2] != 0xff)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (spi_res(readarr))
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user