From a656dffe6de2b294eaea6121de679e179012e35b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anastasia Klimchuk Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:15:16 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] flashchips: Skip "WP untested" message for SFDP-capable chip This entry in the flashchips represent a "SFDP-capable chip" and it doesn't make sense to show the message "WP operation has status untested, please report this". The entry can cover any generic SDFP chip and what would you report? Secondly, the entry "SFDP-capable chip" does not currently support WP operations anyway. Going further, we will be working with SFDP way more, so this area needs to be gradually upgraded. Change-Id: I7e945389895a8042df3aaae72bccf73405be8651 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk --- flashchips.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c index 742e01719..17b5fe8a6 100644 --- a/flashchips.c +++ b/flashchips.c @@ -23522,7 +23522,7 @@ const struct flashchip flashchips[] = { /* We present our own "report this" text hence we do not */ /* want the default "This flash part has status UNTESTED..." */ /* text to be printed. */ - .tested = TEST_OK_PREW, + .tested = TEST_OK_PREWB, .probe = PROBE_SPI_SFDP, .block_erasers = {}, /* set by probing function */ .unlock = SPI_DISABLE_BLOCKPROTECT, /* is this safe? */