mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-30 08:23:42 +02:00
flashrom.c: Fix up stale FIXME comment when doit() was removed
Once upon a time flashrom had a entry point function called doit(). Excise the last mention of it here so that we may never mention it again. BUG=none TEST=none Change-Id: I40d815b7154456c323b4230cd3fed2cc2e8e3641 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52365 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cbe8a39ece
commit
aaf1c60043
@ -2189,8 +2189,8 @@ int selfcheck(void)
|
|||||||
return ret;
|
return ret;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once doit() has a better
|
/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once prepare_flash_access()
|
||||||
* function signature.
|
* has a better function signature.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static int chip_safety_check(const struct flashctx *flash, int force,
|
static int chip_safety_check(const struct flashctx *flash, int force,
|
||||||
int read_it, int write_it, int erase_it, int verify_it)
|
int read_it, int write_it, int erase_it, int verify_it)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user