mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-27 23:22:37 +02:00
s25f.c: Fix mismatched function definitions
This was missed because `uint32_t` is `unsigned int` in most cases. However, it is not the case for DJGPP 6.1.0 for some reason. Tested with manibuilder, solves some build errors on the DJGPP target. Change-Id: I656a72b85d4c70b57f6ff9268186a4a60933f8a9 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52473 Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b08fd6bad8
commit
bc99e0659f
6
s25f.c
6
s25f.c
@ -237,8 +237,7 @@ static int s25fs_restore_cr3nv(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t cfg)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int s25fs_block_erase_d8(struct flashctx *flash,
|
||||
uint32_t addr, uint32_t blocklen)
|
||||
int s25fs_block_erase_d8(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static int cr3nv_checked = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -301,8 +300,7 @@ int s25fs_block_erase_d8(struct flashctx *flash,
|
||||
return s25f_poll_status(flash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int s25fl_block_erase(struct flashctx *flash,
|
||||
uint32_t addr, uint32_t blocklen)
|
||||
int s25fl_block_erase(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct spi_command erase_cmds[] = {
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user