1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-26 06:32:34 +02:00

Fix verification operation

I broke this in r1702 where I enabled avoidance of the verification step if
we did not modify anything in the erase/write step. The problem is that
all_skipped is initialized to true and hence it would only ever verify if
there have been changes noted in the erase/write step. This obviously
breaks the verification operation (-v/--verify) because there we never
enter the erase/write loop.

The better alternative would be to enable (the implicit) verification
in the write loop and not in cli_classic.c. This would require a bigger
change due to the existance of dont_verify_it. Eventually this is the
right thing to do but not so shortly before a release.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r1707.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Tauner 2013-08-12 22:58:43 +00:00
parent 463dd6953e
commit c4f44df55f
2 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -175,8 +175,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
cli_classic_abort_usage(); cli_classic_abort_usage();
} }
if (dont_verify_it) { if (dont_verify_it) {
fprintf(stderr, "--verify and --noverify are" fprintf(stderr, "--verify and --noverify are mutually exclusive. Aborting.\n");
"mutually exclusive. Aborting.\n");
cli_classic_abort_usage(); cli_classic_abort_usage();
} }
filename = strdup(optarg); filename = strdup(optarg);
@ -184,8 +183,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
break; break;
case 'n': case 'n':
if (verify_it) { if (verify_it) {
fprintf(stderr, "--verify and --noverify are" fprintf(stderr, "--verify and --noverify are mutually exclusive. Aborting.\n");
"mutually exclusive. Aborting.\n");
cli_classic_abort_usage(); cli_classic_abort_usage();
} }
dont_verify_it = 1; dont_verify_it = 1;

View File

@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ struct shutdown_func_data {
*/ */
static int may_register_shutdown = 0; static int may_register_shutdown = 0;
/* Did we change something or was every erase/write skipped (if any)? */
static bool all_skipped = true;
static int check_block_eraser(const struct flashctx *flash, int k, int log); static int check_block_eraser(const struct flashctx *flash, int k, int log);
/* Register a function to be executed on programmer shutdown. /* Register a function to be executed on programmer shutdown.
@ -1309,7 +1312,6 @@ static int selfcheck_eraseblocks(const struct flashchip *chip)
return ret; return ret;
} }
static bool all_skipped = true;
static int erase_and_write_block_helper(struct flashctx *flash, static int erase_and_write_block_helper(struct flashctx *flash,
unsigned int start, unsigned int len, unsigned int start, unsigned int len,
uint8_t *curcontents, uint8_t *curcontents,
@ -1995,7 +1997,8 @@ int doit(struct flashctx *flash, int force, const char *filename, int read_it,
} }
} }
if (verify_it && !all_skipped) { /* Verify only if we either did not try to write (verify operation) or actually changed something. */
if (verify_it && (!write_it || !all_skipped)) {
msg_cinfo("Verifying flash... "); msg_cinfo("Verifying flash... ");
if (write_it) { if (write_it) {