From cc145f0a21ffe11f06f6ddc819ad274ade782e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anastasia Klimchuk Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:46:13 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix the example Signed-off-by line to be displayed properly It was not displayed, so needed to be fixed. Secondly, it is just one line and can be an inline code markup instead of a code-block (the latter was not displayed for some reasons). Change-Id: I0f26d6fb03d1491daefa4a362068f674230e94a6 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76663 Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) --- doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst index b4887efa7..950fa91da 100644 --- a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst +++ b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst @@ -87,9 +87,7 @@ We employ a similar sign-off procedure as the `Linux kernel developers `_ do. Add a note such as -.. code-block:: - - Signed-off-by: Random J Developer +:code:`Signed-off-by: Random J Developer ` to your email/patch if you agree with the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 printed below. Read `this post on the LKML