mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-26 22:52:34 +02:00
erasure_layout: Fix init_eraseblock segmentation fault
Fix a segmentation fault that is caused by accessing an invalid "subedata" pointer on the last iteration of the init_eraseblock loop. Instead, short circuit the loop condition to check the sub block index first, and do not access the invalid pointer if it is the last sub block. Issue was encountered in: - OS: OpenBSD 7.5 amd64 - Compiler: clang 16.0.6 - Chip: Macronix MX25U6435E/F BUG=https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/555 Change-Id: I61bf0d93aa9f0b2b420b146be16fcd5124f0dc5d Signed-off-by: Grant Pannell <grant@digitaldj.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/84234 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: DigitalDJ Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
11d5c1750f
commit
d71e88ecfb
@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ static void init_eraseblock(struct erase_layout *layout, size_t idx, size_t bloc
|
||||
|
||||
edata->first_sub_block_index = *sub_block_index;
|
||||
struct eraseblock_data *subedata = &layout[idx - 1].layout_list[*sub_block_index];
|
||||
while (subedata->start_addr >= start_addr && subedata->end_addr <= end_addr &&
|
||||
*sub_block_index < layout[idx-1].block_count) {
|
||||
while (*sub_block_index < layout[idx-1].block_count &&
|
||||
subedata->start_addr >= start_addr && subedata->end_addr <= end_addr) {
|
||||
(*sub_block_index)++;
|
||||
subedata++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user