mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-07-01 22:21:16 +02:00
Fix several -Wno-implicit-fallthrough warnings
GCC is picky about the comment being where the break should go. Change-Id: I05db2fb34025fefe2c6ddd1274c8e45b7cc5a4b6 Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30406 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Nico Huber

parent
e2cbb12f22
commit
db7482bb72
@ -269,19 +269,22 @@ static void spi_prettyprint_status_register_welwip(uint8_t status)
|
||||
static void spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp(uint8_t status, int bp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (bp) {
|
||||
/* Fall through. */
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 4 (BP4) is %sset\n",
|
||||
(status & (1 << 6)) ? "" : "not ");
|
||||
/* Fall through. */
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 3 (BP3) is %sset\n",
|
||||
(status & (1 << 5)) ? "" : "not ");
|
||||
/* Fall through. */
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 2 (BP2) is %sset\n",
|
||||
(status & (1 << 4)) ? "" : "not ");
|
||||
/* Fall through. */
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 1 (BP1) is %sset\n",
|
||||
(status & (1 << 3)) ? "" : "not ");
|
||||
/* Fall through. */
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
msg_cdbg("Chip status register: Block Protect 0 (BP0) is %sset\n",
|
||||
(status & (1 << 2)) ? "" : "not ");
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user