None of these targets have been maintained or used for several years:
dediprog:
- Wasn't accepted by the argument filter in main.rs.
ec:
- Is incompatible with most tests because the EC only supports one
protection range.
servo:
- Has been broken for >3 years because it uses the programmer string
"ft2231_spi:type=servo-v2", where "ft2231" should be "ft2232".
BUG=b:239357853
BRANCH=none
TEST=flashrom_tester on dedede
Change-Id: Iee94f6bb5ff8c5451acb8bcaabf28119006d0ef5
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
flashrom_tester 'flashrom' crate was implemented using the flashrom
commandline. Add a second implementation using the libflashrom interface
via the libflashrom and libflashrom-sys rust bindings.
BUG=b:230545739
BRANCH=None
TEST=cargo test
TEST=on grunt (AMD)
TEST=/usr/bin/flashrom_tester --libflashrom host
TEST=/usr/bin/flashrom_tester --flashrom_binary /usr/sbin/flashrom host
Change-Id: Ic4db6c829d7e8dc707a10c10e1ca0d9b8abccdec
Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65282
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
crossystem uses flashrom to gather data on some platforms. To avoid
firmware lock deadlock, call crossystem before initialising libflashrom.
When querying hardware write protect status, provide an argument to
crossystem so that only that field is queried. This also avoids the
deadlock, and improves performance.
BUG=b:239496316
BRANCH=None
TEST=on trogdor(arm), grunt(amd), hatch(intel):
TEST=flashrom_tester --libflashrom /usr/sbin/flashrom host Coreboot_ELOG_sanity
TEST=flashrom_tester /usr/sbin/flashrom host Coreboot_ELOG_sanity
Change-Id: I7d94cfc6ccbfbec91f12151eb0004724ccfc4e00
Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65962
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
To allow FlashromCmd to be reimplemented with libflashrom move all
concrete cmd functions into the FlashromCmd type that implements the
Flashrom trait. This allows users to be generalised upon the Flashrom
trait as the contract rather than the concrete FlashromCmd type.
Change-Id: Ie2b4e7e91d69043fd50d1c57f6585fc9946fab10
Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64849
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
We can just use the libc functions directly. This is exactly what nix
does anyway.
BUG=none
TEST=unit tests
BRANCH=none
Original-Change-Id: I45c02f0c71d164bd8f504fe2b8d3acd54e0d5704
Original-Signed-off-by: Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/+/2560393
Original-Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Allen Webb <allenwebb@google.com>
Original-Commit-Queue: Allen Webb <allenwebb@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1ba7dbe83e01d270b6d8d597a079ea3bfeb2117e)
Change-Id: Iea61c65efb04da9cd0bc0bd85a34fc10912ea87b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52889
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Since interrupting the test process may be dangerous (leaving the flash
in an inconsistent state), we'll catch SIGINT and print a warning the
first time, also using it as a signal that we should stop at a
convenient time. Any following SIGINT will be handled as normal (killing
the process).
BUG=b:143251344
TEST=Run tool and verify it exits after a test with a single ^C, exits
immediately given two.
BRANCH=None
Original-Cq-Depend: chromium:2059548
Original-Change-Id: Ib8a7799cba6dbca57dc7f1d3c87521f132c21818
Original-Signed-off-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/+/2050050
Original-Tested-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If43aea0580fcc7e698daad2ffe085a3c9da5bc41
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/49915
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
The following is a E2E tester for a specific chip/chipset
combo. The tester itself is completely self-contained and
allows the user to specify which tests they wish to preform.
Supported tests include:
- chip-name
- read
- write
- erase
- wp-locking
Change-Id: Ic2905a76cad90b1546b9328d668bf8abbf8aed44
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38951
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
