1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-27 23:22:37 +02:00

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergii Dmytruk
125a328b4d spi25_statusreg: support reading/writing configuration register
One more variation of registers.

This one is read via a separate RDCR command, but written as if it's
SR2 using WRSR_EXT2.

Change-Id: I45f9afcc31f1928ef6263a749596380082963de4
Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66211
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2022-11-19 06:56:11 +00:00
Sergii Dmytruk
f32f5e31d9 spi25_statusreg.c: support reading security register
Not to be confused with "secure registers" of OTP.

Security register is a dedicated status register for security-related
bits. You don't write its value directly, issuing special write commands
with no data set separate OTP bits to 1 automatically (WRSCUR, WPSEL
commands). No WREN is necessary, but at least some datasheets indicate
BUSY state after those write commands.

Unlike cases where OTP bit is part of SR and can only be written while
in OTP mode, security register can only be written outside of the mode.

The register is found in at least these chips by Macronix:
 * MX25L6436E
 * MX25L6445E
 * MX25L6465E
 * MX25L6473E

Change-Id: Iae1753ca4cb051127a5bcbeba7f064053adb8dae
Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59709
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2022-11-19 06:54:20 +00:00
Nico Huber
d90e2b3e2c flashchips,spi25: Replace .wrea_override with FEATURE_4BA_EAR_1716
There are two competing sets of instructions to access the extended
address register of 4BA SPI chips. Some chips even support both sets.

So far, we assumed the 0xc5/0xc8 instructions by default and allowed
to override the write instructions with the `.wrea_override` field.
This has some disadvantages:

* The additional field is easily overlooked. So when adding a new
  flash chip, one might assume only 0xc5/0xc8 are supported.

* We cannot describe flash chips completely that allow both
  instructions (and some programmers may be picky about which
  instructions can be used).

Therefore, replace the `.wrea_override` field with a feature flag.

Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Change-Id: I6d82f24898acd0789203516a7456fd785907bc10
Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/357
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64636
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
2022-06-23 14:38:08 +00:00
Nico Huber
f6d702e2d0 spi25_statusreg: Allow WRSR_EXT for Status Register 3
Spansion flash chips S25FL128L and S25FL256L use the WRSR instruction to
write more than 2 registers. So align SR2 and SR3 support: The current
FEATURE_WRSR_EXT is renamed to FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 and FEATURE_WRSR_EXT3
is added. Also, WRSR3 needs a separate flag now.

Verified that FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 still works using the `dummy_flasher`.

Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Change-Id: Ibdfc6eb3d2cfecbf8da0493d067031ddb079a094
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64746
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
2022-06-20 16:36:20 +00:00
Thomas Heijligen
87d7b110d6 Introduce an include directory for header files
Move all header files to the new `include` directory.
Adapt include directives and build systems to the new directory.

Change-Id: Iaddd6bbfa0624b166d422f665877f096983bf4cf
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felix.singer@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
2022-04-29 01:50:46 +00:00