mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-27 15:12:36 +02:00
d7e4240263
Although chipoff_t is fairly clearly documented on its own, it seems fairly frequent that developers will treat the end address of a flash region as an exclusive upper bound rather than the inclusive one it should be; for example CB:82496 fixes an incorrect use that affected multiple sites, and CB:73571 stemmed from a similar cause. Add a clarifying comment to call attention to this, to help programmers avoid making similar mistakes in the future. Change-Id: I80b61a87ca31bd5a116224aadb4e211ee6841e1f Signed-off-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82677 Reviewed-by: Hsuan-ting Chen <roccochen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>