mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-29 16:03:47 +02:00
4e61edbace
These chips have the exact same characteristics as their 8/16/32 counterparts, except for the different flash size. Relevant datasheets (I've also included the FM25Q32 as a reference): * https://www.fmsh.com/nvm/FM25Q04_ds_eng.pdf * https://www.fmsh.com/nvm/FM25Q32_ds_eng.pdf * https://www.fmsh.com/nvm/FM25Q64_ds_eng.pdf * https://www.fmsh.com/nvm/FM25Q128_ds_eng.pdf Testing status will be updated in a subsequent commit. Change-Id: I88fcc2bbb9706c8adb3722da6aa0e1d2d04c3fde Signed-off-by: Samantaz Fox <coding@samantaz.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/83969 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>