mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-28 07:23:43 +02:00
ed43237cfa
Two tests cover the code which performs do_erase operation. First one works with fake chip and dummy programmer. Fake chip has all operations defined, and a buffer to emulate chip memory. Second one uses the chip which is closer to the real one, because read/write/unlock/erase operations are real. The tests takes the advantage of dummyflasher's capability of emulating a W25Q128.V chip. BUG=b:181803212 TEST=builds and ninja test Change-Id: I6f74bfe4e02244d24d6c837cc3d551251e7b4898 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56501 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>