1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-27 15:12:36 +02:00

tests: Add function to test programmer init error paths

New function tests an error path for programmer initialisation,
and expects programmer init to fail with given error code.

BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test

Change-Id: Icc59396e604d74442852b4bbd575440df3347c3f
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66507
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
This commit is contained in:
Anastasia Klimchuk 2022-08-08 10:36:06 +10:00
parent 02f43e89ba
commit 4adfd99d78
2 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -72,3 +72,22 @@ void run_probe_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io,
clear_spi_id_cache();
run_lifecycle(state, io, prog, param, chip_name, &probe_chip);
}
void run_init_error_path(void **state, const struct io_mock *io, const struct programmer_entry *prog,
const char *param, const int error_code)
{
(void) state; /* unused */
io_mock_register(io);
struct flashrom_programmer *flashprog;
char *param_dup = strdup(param);
printf("Testing init error path for programmer=%s with params: %s ...\n", prog->name, param_dup);
assert_int_equal(error_code, flashrom_programmer_init(&flashprog, prog->name, param_dup));
printf("... init failed with error code %i as expected\n", error_code);
free(param_dup);
io_mock_register(NULL);
}

View File

@ -35,4 +35,6 @@ void run_basic_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io,
void run_probe_lifecycle(void **state, const struct io_mock *io,
const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param, const char *const chip_name);
void run_init_error_path(void **state, const struct io_mock *io,
const struct programmer_entry *prog, const char *param, const int error_code);
#endif /* __LIFECYCLE_H__ */