1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-27 07:02:34 +02:00

tests: ensure chip erase operation is executed

The `full_chip_erase_with_wp_dummyflasher_test_success` test case
checks that erasing a write-protected region of a dummyflasher chip
fails.

However erase optimization may cause the erase operation to be skipped
if the flash contents are already erased, so the erase operation appears
to succeed and the test case fails.

Writing a non-erased value to the chip ensures that an erase operation
will be executed and write protection will be properly tested.

BUG=b:237620197
BRANCH=none
TEST=ninja test

Change-Id: Ia00444dcd2ad96c64832a13201efbd064cd7302d
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolai Artemiev 2022-11-02 12:11:02 +11:00 committed by Edward O'Callaghan
parent c0813e7edd
commit 7be01fd451
2 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ enum write_granularity {
#define FEATURE_WRSR3 (1 << 23)
#define ERASED_VALUE(flash) (((flash)->chip->feature_bits & FEATURE_ERASED_ZERO) ? 0x00 : 0xff)
#define UNERASED_VALUE(flash) (((flash)->chip->feature_bits & FEATURE_ERASED_ZERO) ? 0xff : 0x00)
enum test_state {
OK = 0,

View File

@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static void teardown(struct flashrom_layout **layout)
static const struct flashchip chip_W25Q128_V = {
.vendor = "aklm&dummyflasher",
.total_size = 16 * 1024,
.page_size = 1024,
.tested = TEST_OK_PREW,
.read = SPI_CHIP_READ,
.write = SPI_CHIP_WRITE256,
@ -268,6 +269,14 @@ void full_chip_erase_with_wp_dummyflasher_test_success(void **state)
this stage WP is not enabled and erase completes successfully. */
assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_flash_erase(&flash));
/* Write non-erased value to entire chip so that erase operations cannot
* be optimized away. */
unsigned long size = flashrom_flash_getsize(&flash);
uint8_t *const contents = malloc(size);
memset(contents, UNERASED_VALUE(&flash), size);
assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_image_write(&flash, contents, size, NULL));
free(contents);
assert_int_equal(0, flashrom_wp_read_cfg(wp_cfg, &flash));
/* Hardware-protect first 4 KiB. */