openwrt/flashrom
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-27 07:02:34 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Fix output of erase_and_write_flash and surroundings

Browse Source 
See http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-July/007220.html
for a discussion about the details.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r1392.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
This commit is contained in:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger 2011-07-26 14:28:35 +00:00 committed by Stefan Tauner
parent 2e88a9f4f0
commit 84d1968250
1 changed files with 16 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
flashrom.c
View File

@ -1471,7 +1471,6 @@ static int walk_eraseregions(struct flashchip *flash, int erasefunction,
start + len - 1);
if (do_something(flash, start, len, param1, param2,
eraser.block_erase)) {
msg_cdbg("\n");
return 1;
}
start += len;
@ -1522,19 +1521,18 @@ int erase_and_write_flash(struct flashchip *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, uint8_t
memcpy(curcontents, oldcontents, size);
for (k = 0; k < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; k++) {
if (k != 0)
msg_cdbg("Looking for another erase function.\n");
if (!usable_erasefunctions) {
msg_cdbg("No usable erase functions left.\n");
break;
}
msg_cdbg("Looking at blockwise erase function %i... ", k);
if (check_block_eraser(flash, k, 1)) {
msg_cdbg("Looking for another erase function.\n");
msg_cdbg("Trying erase function %i... ", k);
if (check_block_eraser(flash, k, 1))
continue;
}
usable_erasefunctions--;
msg_cdbg("trying... ");
ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, &erase_and_write_block_helper, curcontents, newcontents);
msg_cdbg("\n");
ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, &erase_and_write_block_helper,
curcontents, newcontents);
/* If everything is OK, don't try another erase function. */
if (!ret)
break;
@ -1544,14 +1542,19 @@ int erase_and_write_flash(struct flashchip *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, uint8_t
*/
if (!usable_erasefunctions)
continue;
/* Reading the whole chip may take a while, inform the user even
* in non-verbose mode.
*/
msg_cinfo("Reading current flash chip contents... ");
if (flash->read(flash, curcontents, 0, size)) {
/* Now we are truly screwed. Read failed as well. */
msg_cerr("Can't read anymore!\n");
msg_cerr("Can't read anymore! Aborting.\n");
/* We have no idea about the flash chip contents, so
* retrying with another erase function is pointless.
*/
break;
}
msg_cinfo("done. ");
}
/* Free the scratchpad. */
free(curcontents);
@ -1559,7 +1562,7 @@ int erase_and_write_flash(struct flashchip *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, uint8_t
if (ret) {
msg_cerr("FAILED!\n");
} else {
msg_cinfo("Done.\n");
msg_cinfo("Erase/write done.\n");
}
return ret;
}
@ -1938,13 +1941,13 @@ int doit(struct flashchip *flash, int force, const char *filename, int read_it,
* preserved, but in that case we might perform unneeded erase which
* takes time as well.
*/
msg_cdbg("Reading old flash chip contents... ");
msg_cinfo("Reading old flash chip contents... ");
if (flash->read(flash, oldcontents, 0, size)) {
ret = 1;
msg_cdbg("FAILED.\n");
msg_cinfo("FAILED.\n");
goto out;
}
msg_cdbg("done.\n");
msg_cinfo("done.\n");
// This should be moved into each flash part's code to do it
// cleanly. This does the job.