1
0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-26 22:52:34 +02:00

flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks

Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aarya <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Anastasia Klimchuk 2023-06-09 23:42:06 +10:00
parent 2b692d78c2
commit 9917fa0623

View File

@ -449,9 +449,7 @@ struct flashchip {
/*
* Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function
* is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function.
* The first one that fits will be chosen. There is currently no way to
* influence that behaviour. For testing just comment out the other
* elements or set the function pointer to NULL.
* The logic for how to optimally select erase functions is in erasure_layout.c
*/
struct block_eraser {
struct eraseblock {