openwrt/flashrom
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git synced 2025-04-27 15:12:36 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

flash: Update the comment for flashchip eraseblocks

Browse Source 
Change-Id: Ica7790667ac4c1baf961cb7a330e08178e2c0c28
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/75744
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aarya <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Anastasia Klimchuk 2023-06-09 23:42:06 +10:00
parent 2b692d78c2
commit 9917fa0623
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
include/flash.h
View File

@ -449,9 +449,7 @@ struct flashchip {
/* /*
* Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function * Erase blocks and associated erase function. Any chip erase function
* is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function. * is stored as chip-sized virtual block together with said function.
* The first one that fits will be chosen. There is currently no way to * The logic for how to optimally select erase functions is in erasure_layout.c
* influence that behaviour. For testing just comment out the other
* elements or set the function pointer to NULL.
*/ */
struct block_eraser { struct block_eraser {
struct eraseblock { struct eraseblock {