mirror of
https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom.git
synced 2025-04-26 14:42:36 +02:00
sbxxx: Cleanup
- Move programmer definition to the top. - Rewrite array accesses to use indices instead of using pointer arithmetic. - Move length check and opcode extraction to a function. - Move IMC parameter handling into existing IMC handling function. - Split comparing and resetting the FIFO pointer. Corresponding to flashrom svn r1793. Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7141b98649
commit
d5b2aef69d
190
sb600spi.c
190
sb600spi.c
@ -54,6 +54,22 @@ enum amd_chipset {
|
||||
};
|
||||
static enum amd_chipset amd_gen = CHIPSET_AMD_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
||||
#define FIFO_SIZE_OLD 8
|
||||
|
||||
static int sb600_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt, unsigned int readcnt,
|
||||
const unsigned char *writearr, unsigned char *readarr);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct spi_programmer spi_programmer_sb600 = {
|
||||
.type = SPI_CONTROLLER_SB600,
|
||||
.max_data_read = FIFO_SIZE_OLD,
|
||||
.max_data_write = FIFO_SIZE_OLD - 3,
|
||||
.command = sb600_spi_send_command,
|
||||
.multicommand = default_spi_send_multicommand,
|
||||
.read = default_spi_read,
|
||||
.write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
|
||||
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void determine_generation(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
amd_gen = CHIPSET_AMD_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
@ -133,38 +149,45 @@ static void reset_internal_fifo_pointer(void)
|
||||
|
||||
static int compare_internal_fifo_pointer(uint8_t want)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint8_t tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xd) & 0x07;
|
||||
want &= 0x7;
|
||||
if (want != tmp) {
|
||||
msg_perr("FIFO pointer corruption! Pointer is %d, wanted %d\n", tmp, want);
|
||||
msg_perr("Something else is accessing the flash chip and "
|
||||
"causes random corruption.\nPlease stop all "
|
||||
"applications and drivers and IPMI which access the "
|
||||
"flash chip.\n");
|
||||
uint8_t have = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xd) & 0x07;
|
||||
want %= FIFO_SIZE_OLD;
|
||||
if (have != want) {
|
||||
msg_perr("AMD SPI FIFO pointer corruption! Pointer is %d, wanted %d\n", have, want);
|
||||
msg_perr("Something else is accessing the flash chip and causes random corruption.\n"
|
||||
"Please stop all applications and drivers and IPMI which access the flash chip.\n");
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
msg_pspew("SB600 FIFO pointer is %d, wanted %d\n", tmp, want);
|
||||
msg_pspew("AMD SPI FIFO pointer is %d, wanted %d\n", have, want);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(uint8_t want)
|
||||
/* Check the number of bytes to be transmitted and extract opcode. */
|
||||
static int check_readwritecnt(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt, unsigned int readcnt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
unsigned int maxwritecnt = flash->pgm->spi.max_data_write + 3;
|
||||
if (writecnt > maxwritecnt) {
|
||||
msg_pinfo("%s: SPI controller can not send %d bytes, it is limited to %d bytes\n",
|
||||
__func__, writecnt, maxwritecnt);
|
||||
return SPI_INVALID_LENGTH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = compare_internal_fifo_pointer(want);
|
||||
reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
unsigned int maxreadcnt = flash->pgm->spi.max_data_read + 3;
|
||||
if (readcnt > maxreadcnt) {
|
||||
msg_pinfo("%s: SPI controller can not receive %d bytes, it is limited to %d bytes\n",
|
||||
__func__, readcnt, maxreadcnt);
|
||||
return SPI_INVALID_LENGTH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void execute_command(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
msg_pspew("Executing... ");
|
||||
mmio_writeb(mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 2) | 1, sb600_spibar + 2);
|
||||
|
||||
while (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 2) & 1)
|
||||
;
|
||||
msg_pspew("done\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int sb600_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt,
|
||||
@ -172,60 +195,45 @@ static int sb600_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt,
|
||||
const unsigned char *writearr,
|
||||
unsigned char *readarr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int count;
|
||||
/* First byte is cmd which can not being sent through FIFO. */
|
||||
/* First byte is cmd which can not be sent through the FIFO. */
|
||||
unsigned char cmd = *writearr++;
|
||||
unsigned int readoffby1;
|
||||
unsigned char readwrite;
|
||||
|
||||
writecnt--;
|
||||
msg_pspew("%s, cmd=0x%02x, writecnt=%d, readcnt=%d\n", __func__, cmd, writecnt, readcnt);
|
||||
mmio_writeb(cmd, sb600_spibar + 0);
|
||||
|
||||
msg_pspew("%s, cmd=%x, writecnt=%x, readcnt=%x\n",
|
||||
__func__, cmd, writecnt, readcnt);
|
||||
int ret = check_readwritecnt(flash, writecnt, readcnt);
|
||||
if (ret != 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (readcnt > 8) {
|
||||
msg_pinfo("%s, SB600 SPI controller can not receive %d bytes, "
|
||||
"it is limited to 8 bytes\n", __func__, readcnt);
|
||||
return SPI_INVALID_LENGTH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (writecnt > 8) {
|
||||
msg_pinfo("%s, SB600 SPI controller can not send %d bytes, "
|
||||
"it is limited to 8 bytes\n", __func__, writecnt);
|
||||
return SPI_INVALID_LENGTH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* This is a workaround for a bug in SB600 and SB700. If we only send
|
||||
/* This is a workaround for a bug in SPI controller. If we only send
|
||||
* an opcode and no additional data/address, the SPI controller will
|
||||
* read one byte too few from the chip. Basically, the last byte of
|
||||
* the chip response is discarded and will not end up in the FIFO.
|
||||
* It is unclear if the CS# line is set high too early as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
readoffby1 = (writecnt) ? 0 : 1;
|
||||
readwrite = (readcnt + readoffby1) << 4 | (writecnt);
|
||||
unsigned int readoffby1 = (writecnt > 0) ? 0 : 1;
|
||||
uint8_t readwrite = (readcnt + readoffby1) << 4 | (writecnt);
|
||||
mmio_writeb(readwrite, sb600_spibar + 1);
|
||||
mmio_writeb(cmd, sb600_spibar + 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Before we use the FIFO, reset it first. */
|
||||
reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Send the write byte to FIFO. */
|
||||
msg_pspew("Writing: ");
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < writecnt; count++, writearr++) {
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", *writearr);
|
||||
mmio_writeb(*writearr, sb600_spibar + 0xC);
|
||||
msg_pspew("Filling FIFO: ");
|
||||
int count;
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < writecnt; count++) {
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", writearr[count]);
|
||||
mmio_writeb(writearr[count], sb600_spibar + 0xC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
msg_pspew("\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We should send the data by sequence, which means we need to reset
|
||||
* the FIFO pointer to the first byte we want to send.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt))
|
||||
if (compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt))
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
msg_pspew("Executing: \n");
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We should send the data in sequence, which means we need to reset
|
||||
* the FIFO pointer to the first byte we want to send.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
|
||||
execute_command();
|
||||
if (compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt + readcnt))
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* After the command executed, we should find out the index of the
|
||||
@ -238,34 +246,30 @@ static int sb600_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt,
|
||||
* the opcode, the FIFO already stores the response from the chip.
|
||||
* Usually, the chip will respond with 0x00 or 0xff.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt + readcnt))
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip the bytes we sent. */
|
||||
msg_pspew("Skipping: ");
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < writecnt; count++) {
|
||||
cmd = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC);
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", cmd);
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC));
|
||||
}
|
||||
msg_pspew("\n");
|
||||
if (compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt))
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
msg_pspew("Reading: ");
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < readcnt; count++, readarr++) {
|
||||
*readarr = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC);
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", *readarr);
|
||||
msg_pspew("Reading FIFO: ");
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < readcnt; count++) {
|
||||
readarr[count] = mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 0xC);
|
||||
msg_pspew("[%02x]", readarr[count]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
msg_pspew("\n");
|
||||
if (reset_compare_internal_fifo_pointer(readcnt + writecnt))
|
||||
if (compare_internal_fifo_pointer(writecnt+readcnt))
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mmio_readb(sb600_spibar + 1) != readwrite) {
|
||||
msg_perr("Unexpected change in SB600 read/write count!\n");
|
||||
msg_perr("Something else is accessing the flash chip and "
|
||||
"causes random corruption.\nPlease stop all "
|
||||
"applications and drivers and IPMI which access the "
|
||||
"flash chip.\n");
|
||||
msg_perr("Unexpected change in AMD SPI read/write count!\n");
|
||||
msg_perr("Something else is accessing the flash chip and causes random corruption.\n"
|
||||
"Please stop all applications and drivers and IPMI which access the flash chip.\n");
|
||||
return SPI_PROGRAMMER_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -328,12 +332,28 @@ static int handle_speed(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
return set_speed(dev, &spispeeds[spispeed_idx]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int sb600_handle_imc(struct pci_dev *dev, bool amd_imc_force)
|
||||
static int handle_imc(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Handle IMC everywhere but sb600 which does not have one. */
|
||||
if (amd_gen == CHIPSET_SB6XX)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
bool amd_imc_force = false;
|
||||
char *arg = extract_programmer_param("amd_imc_force");
|
||||
if (arg && !strcmp(arg, "yes")) {
|
||||
amd_imc_force = true;
|
||||
msg_pspew("amd_imc_force enabled.\n");
|
||||
} else if (arg && !strlen(arg)) {
|
||||
msg_perr("Missing argument for amd_imc_force.\n");
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else if (arg) {
|
||||
msg_perr("Unknown argument for amd_imc_force: \"%s\" (not \"yes\").\n", arg);
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: we should not only look at IntegratedImcPresent (LPC Dev 20, Func 3, 40h) but also at
|
||||
* IMCEnable(Strap) and Override EcEnable(Strap) (sb8xx, sb9xx?, a50: Misc_Reg: 80h-87h;
|
||||
* sb7xx, sp5100: PM_Reg: B0h-B1h) etc. */
|
||||
@ -361,38 +381,11 @@ static int sb600_handle_imc(struct pci_dev *dev, bool amd_imc_force)
|
||||
return amd_imc_shutdown(dev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct spi_programmer spi_programmer_sb600 = {
|
||||
.type = SPI_CONTROLLER_SB600,
|
||||
.max_data_read = 8,
|
||||
.max_data_write = 5,
|
||||
.command = sb600_spi_send_command,
|
||||
.multicommand = default_spi_send_multicommand,
|
||||
.read = default_spi_read,
|
||||
.write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
|
||||
.write_aai = default_spi_write_aai,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int sb600_probe_spi(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pci_dev *smbus_dev;
|
||||
uint32_t tmp;
|
||||
uint8_t reg;
|
||||
bool amd_imc_force = false;
|
||||
|
||||
char *arg = extract_programmer_param("amd_imc_force");
|
||||
if (arg && !strcmp(arg, "yes")) {
|
||||
amd_imc_force = true;
|
||||
msg_pspew("amd_imc_force enabled.\n");
|
||||
} else if (arg && !strlen(arg)) {
|
||||
msg_perr("Missing argument for amd_imc_force.\n");
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
return ERROR_FATAL;
|
||||
} else if (arg) {
|
||||
msg_perr("Unknown argument for amd_imc_force: \"%s\" (not \"yes\").\n", arg);
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
return ERROR_FATAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
free(arg);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Read SPI_BaseAddr */
|
||||
tmp = pci_read_long(dev, 0xa0);
|
||||
@ -549,12 +542,9 @@ int sb600_probe_spi(struct pci_dev *dev)
|
||||
if (handle_speed(dev) != 0)
|
||||
return ERROR_FATAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sb600_handle_imc(dev, amd_imc_force) != 0)
|
||||
if (handle_imc(dev) != 0)
|
||||
return ERROR_FATAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Bring the FIFO to a clean state. */
|
||||
reset_internal_fifo_pointer();
|
||||
|
||||
register_spi_programmer(&spi_programmer_sb600);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user