Chip erasures take much longer than sector and bank
erasures. Allow the wait loop helper to multiply the
max timeout in this very specific case while quickly
timeout for other ops that are expected to be shorter.
V.2: Fix nonsense fall though warn-err
BUG=b:152558985,b:148745673
BRANCH=none
TEST=flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -E &&
flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -w foo
(cycle)..
Change-Id: I4a36aa3101827e69eb244775d25bbb476d4bb780
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/41123
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam McNally <sammc@google.com>
Turns out broken erasures highlighted some of the issues
in the write256 implementation. After a fair amount of
time deciphering scarce documentation details a correct
implementation was finally derived.
V.2: Rename 'start_program() -> execute_write()' to
clarify the intention and not to overload the term
'program' since the MST actually runs a 'program'
itself.
BUG=b:152558985,b:148745673
BRANCH=none
TEST=flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -E &&
flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -w foo &&
flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -r foo &&
hexdump -C foo
Change-Id: If61ff95697f886d3301a907b76283322c39ef5c7
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/41080
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam McNally <sammc@google.com>
Before issuing SPI opcodes into 0x61 the top three BITS of
0x60 need to be carefully crafted. Correctly craft these
in the case of SPI erasures and document this registers
expectations. Clean up remaining debug comments while we
are here.
BUG=b:152558985,b:148745673
BRANCH=none
TEST=flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -E &&
flashrom -p realtek_mst_i2c_spi:bus=8 -r foo &&
hexdump -C foo
Change-Id: Ib11ba8f63b11a1c5ebaa68deb7971648de8c2ecd
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/41079
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam McNally <sammc@google.com>
Try to document some of the register magics with plausible
names for readability.
BUG=b:152558985,b:148745673
BRANCH=none
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I97313f6f14438e4cbfc62faa7242cf6fc271f387
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/41022
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
