The `full_chip_erase_with_wp_dummyflasher_test_success` test case
checks that erasing a write-protected region of a dummyflasher chip
fails.
However erase optimization may cause the erase operation to be skipped
if the flash contents are already erased, so the erase operation appears
to succeed and the test case fails.
Writing a non-erased value to the chip ensures that an erase operation
will be executed and write protection will be properly tested.
BUG=b:237620197
BRANCH=none
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: Ia00444dcd2ad96c64832a13201efbd064cd7302d
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Move the definition of the programmer test source files into the
dictionary defining the programmers itself. This way there is a better
overview about which of the available programmers have tests and which
don't.
Also, to keep the tests working, iterate over all programmers and add
their test source files to the list of sources that should be built.
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Change-Id: I307faaf8a9f7ae3c54bd96e7d871a3abb8aadea3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68162
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This forges the way for flashchips.c to be pure declarative
data and lookup functions for dispatch to be pure. This
means that the flashchips data could be extracted out to
be agnostic data of the flashrom code and algorithms.
Change-Id: I02ae7e4c67c5bf34ec2fd7ffe4af8a2aba6fd5e5
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69133
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This paves the way to allow for the conversion of flashchip erase_block
func ptr to enumerate values. This change should be a NOP.
TEST=`diff -u <(objdump -D flashchips.o_bk) <(objdump -D flashchips.o)`.
Change-Id: I122295ec9add0fe0efd27273c9725e5d64f6dbe2
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/69131
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Flashrom I/O mock functions need to be renamed so that they do not
have name clash with standard I/O, because the latter are allowed
to be macros. Adding a prefix to flashrom mock functions avoids
them being accidentally expanded. Standard I/O functions are
expanded and flashrom mocks stay as they are.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test
1) gcc 12.2.0 on Debian
2) clang 15.0 on Chromium OS
Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/411
Change-Id: I7998a8fb1b9e65621e12adbfab5460a245d5606b
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68433
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
The option _FORTIFY_SOURCE, when enabled, can result in some functions
being expanded into _chk variants. For example, `fprintf` can get
expanded into `__fprintf_chk`. This makes sense for building a real
binary, but is not needed for unit tests.
In unit test environment all those functions are wrapped. In the
example above, both `fprintf` and `__fprintf_chk` needed to be mocked.
Disabling _FORTIFY_SOURCE avoids expanding functions into _chk
variants, without any loss of testing coverage because that would
be wrapped/mocked anyway.
This patch also removes two existing _chk wraps because they are not
needed anymore.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test on
1) gcc 12.2.0 on Debian
2) clang 15.0 on Chromium OS
Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/411
Change-Id: I70cb1cd90d1f377ff4606acad3c1b514120ae4f7
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68432
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Rename the list of source files to `test_srcs` so that there is less
confusion with the variable `srcs` from the top-level meson.build file
containing the flashrom source files.
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Change-Id: Ica0fc3923070bff63323204bd58edb5276dc9493
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68228
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This forges the way for flashchips.c to be pure declarative
data and lookup functions for dispatch to be pure. This
means that the flashchips data could be extracted out to
be agnostic data of the flashrom code and algorithms.
TEST='R|W|E && --flash-name' on ARM, AMD & Intel DUT's.
Change-Id: I612d46fefedf2b69e7e2064aa857fa0756efb4e7
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66788
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This forges the way for flashchips.c to be pure declarative
data and lookup functions for dispatch to be pure. This
means that the flashchips data could be extracted out to
be agnostic data of the flashrom code and algorithms.
TEST='R|W|E && --flash-name' on ARM, AMD & Intel DUT's.
Change-Id: I80149de169464b204fb09f1424a86fc645b740fd
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66782
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
This forges the way for flashchips.c to be pure declarative
data and lookup functions for dispatch to be pure. This
means that the flashchips data could be extracted out to
be agnostic data of the flashrom code and algorithms.
TEST='R|W|E && --flash-name' on ARM, AMD & Intel DUT's.
Change-Id: I00aaab9c83f305cd47e78c36d9c2867f2b73c396
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66781
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Replace the `decode_range` function pointer in `struct flashchip` to an
enum value. The enum value can be used to find the corresponding
function pointer by passing it to `lookup_decode_range_func_ptr()`.
Removing function pointers like `decode_range` makes it possible to represent chip data in a declarative format that does not have to be
stored as C source code.
BUG=b:242479049
BRANCH=none
TEST=ninja && ninja test
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Change-Id: If6d08d414d3d1ddadc95ca1d407fc87c23ab543d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67195
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
When a file object is created, Meson also checks if the file actually
exists and an error points to the specific line of meson.build if not.
If just a list of filenames is used, then the error occurs at the line
where the list is used.
Thus, use file objects in tests/meson.build for more useful error
messages.
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Change-Id: I0b9144a6b76c1772833817b4e6873818dcf36b05
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68197
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Programmer param can be NULL and this is a valid case which can
be covered by unit test.
`run_lifecycle` needs an adjustment to handle NULL as programmer
param, which is also included in the patch.
Change-Id: I409f1c9ac832943e54107f7cf8652d1f46ac67df
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67642
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Spaces were accidentally introduced in previous commit, replace
with tabs as it should be.
Change-Id: Ic3a7d3004b8358953917a6666bcf8f1cdade02fd
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
fileno can be a function and a macro in FreeBSD, depending on whether
the environment in multi-threaded or single-threaded. For single
thread, macro is used. Macro is expanded into a inline code which
accesses private field of file descriptor. This is impossible to
mock in tests.
Pretending that environment is multi-threaded makes fileno function
to be called instead of a macro. Function can be mocked for tests.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test
tests pass on two environments:
1) FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC amd64
2) Debian 5.17.11 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Change-Id: I3789ea9107a4cf8033cf59bb96d3c82aa58de026
TICKET: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/411
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67312
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
NON_ZERO can be a negative number, so MOCK_FD is safer option to
use as a mock file descriptor. Also it is more readable.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test (on linux)
Change-Id: I097dd59f69c3fb532ac136796fcf5cae8839af7b
TICKET: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/411
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67310
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Goncharov <chat@joursoir.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This implements a positive selection choice of which programmers should
be built.
- Each programmer is represented through an entry in the programmer
dictionary
- The entry contains:
- A list of systems and CPU families where the programmer can run on
- A list of required dependencies
- A list of sources needed to build the programmer
- A list of compiler flags
- A flag to determin if the programmer should be build on 'auto'
- If an entry is not given it is set to the default value
- If a programmer gets selected, an 'active' flag is added to the entry
on runtime
- All programmers with an 'active' flag will be included in the build
- One or more programmers can be selected through '-Dprogrammer=<>'
- 'auto' enables all programmers which are available, deps are found
and have the 'default' flag
- 'all' enables all programmers which are available and deps are found
- 'group_***' enables all programmers which are available, deps are
found and the programmer belongs to the selected group
- '_programmer_name_' forces the programmer to be built or the build
will fail.
Change-Id: Ib44b26e3748fc71f116184082b4aed0bb208b4c1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63724
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reverts commit 99eca0899b931b21b7c44ed1753c5f01b35798af.
The environment provided by our Jenkins builder doesn't have cmocka.
It's not exactly known why it worked as a subproject. However, if it
allows us to enforce tests in the CI, we should revert now and drop
the subproject again once the environment is updated.
Change-Id: Iafdab92eb8ab96d02fb2c29524d785bdc7a54034
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67345
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Allow for programmer_cfg plumbing in pcidev.c
The pci drivers impacted are plumbed here as well.
Change-Id: Ie0c9d1c0866d44f64d037c596f2e30547fcfd58f
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66671
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Unhandled programmer params are considered as an error for
initialisation procedure, adding tests to run those scenarios.
BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: Ia64f6362f46a029e168bfdb3bdb903328fd1f9c7
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67199
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
`run_init_error_path` tests the scenario when init function of
a programmer fails. Init can fail at different phases and depending
on a specific test scenario it could be before or after shutdown
function has been registered.
If shutdown function has already been registered, it needs to run
because it cleans up the resources allocated during init. This patch
prevents memory leaks.
BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: I604edff18e35b7c044b73d3a8adfa8c800eddfd2
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67198
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Previously, parade lspcon unit test had no custom emulation and
was running basic lifecycle with default mocks (default mocks do
nothing and return success). I have discovered that it does not
work in all environments.
Specifically, in functions `parade_lspcon_wait_command_done`
and `parade_lspcon_wait_rom_free` there is a local variable
`uint8_t val` which is declared and not explicitly initialised. It can
get different initial values depending on the environment/toolchain
(for example gcc vs clang).
Later during the code execution, this variable is used as a holder
for writing/reading data from register(s). For unit test, reading and
writing data from registers is emulated. With default mocks, initial
value of variable was propagated further as if it was "read" from
a register. So the unit test could pass or fail depending on the
initial value of local variable, which in turn depends on environment
and toolchain.
If initial value was 0 the test reliably passed (this is the case with
upstream build environment, locally I have gcc 11.3.0 on x86_64).
If it was 1 the test reliably failed (this is the case of chromium
flashrom tree, this is clang 15.0 under chroot, tested on x86_64 and
arm boards).
If it was any other value then it could be anything.
This patch adds custom mocks for ioctl/read/write operations
and emulates a successful scenario of running a lifecycle. Local
variable is initialised by reading from the register, same as it
happens in the real (non-test) run for this programmer.
BUG=b:242816982
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: I98f52507a0ddbbfbeb390038d14192cacc2be683
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67161
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Depend exclusive on the cmocka package provided by the build
environment. Cmocka is widely available in Linux distributions and BSD
systems. Besides that, it is suboptimal to fetch own dependencies in the
build process. Most packaging systems even forbid fetching additional
assets at build time.
Change-Id: I751c85d5f72e47356113cf55dfbaec73cbd8028c
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66696
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Add tests for i2c programmers that assert that initialisation fails
when allow_brick parameter is not provided.
Example of logs from test run:
[ RUN ] parade_lspcon_no_allow_brick_test_success
Testing init error path for programmer=parade_lspcon with params: bus=254 ...
... init failed with error code -1 as expected
[ OK ] parade_lspcon_no_allow_brick_test_success
BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: I382f563016502f3342131d5f9c0de41dc665b03a
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66508
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
New function tests an error path for programmer initialisation,
and expects programmer init to fail with given error code.
BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: Icc59396e604d74442852b4bbd575440df3347c3f
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66507
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
This unit test does not require any additional mocks because init
and shutdown of i2c infra was covered in realtek programmer lifecycle.
Default mocking of i2c is sufficient to run a basic lifecycle.
To run the test, config option for the programmer needs to be
enabled explicitly, since by default this programmer is disabled.
BUG=b:238816884
TEST=meson configure -Dconfig_mediatek_i2c_spi=true
ninja test
Change-Id: I98a12067d165c90013d33ffc45d20dab5c364c83
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66261
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Goncharov <chat@joursoir.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This unit test does not require any additional mocks because init
and shutdown of i2c infra was covered in realtek programmer lifecycle.
Default mocking of i2c is sufficient to run a basic lifecycle.
To run the test, config option for the programmer needs to be
enabled explicitly, since by default this programmer is disabled.
BUG=b:238816889
TEST=meson configure -Dconfig_parade_lspcon=true
ninja test
Change-Id: I0dcfae4a58c64b2e8d56ec51b4b050534cbb4cd2
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66003
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Tests can be filtered by providing patterns on the command line. The
pattern is the first argument provided to the test binary, if present.
Only tests matching the string provided are run, wildcards * and ?
match any characters, or one character respectively.
`meson test` or `ninja test` will continue to run all tests, as they do
not provide an argument to the test binary.
https://api.cmocka.org/group__cmocka.html
TEST=tests/flashrom_unit_tests 'layout_*'
Change-Id: I45f4ac5ef0cfb74156408022a19769d6598ad2ea
Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65998
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
- Make run_command() calls check for failures to fix warnings about
ignoring errors, see https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/9300.
- Remove `include_directories('../subprojects')` from tests/meson.build.
It isn't necessary and caused build warnings due to referencing files
outside the tests/ directory.
- Fix indent level and formatting in a few places.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=meson; ninja; ninja test
Change-Id: I17ae0c51d68ed004772a237641f08345f4893200
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66060
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
realtek_mst_i2c_spi is the only programmer which uses hyphens instead of
underscores in its parameter names. Thus, for consistency, rename the
parameters so that they use underscores.
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Change-Id: I5ff6d8d432d875670fcaa2088e9cf9d9f1b83dc2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65935
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Currently i2c programmers do not have a safe allow listing
mechanism via board_enable to facilitate fully qualified
chip detection.
Since i2c addresses alone can overlap a user may make the mistake
of using the wrong programmer. Although unlikely, it is within the
realm of possibility that a user could accidently somehow program
another chip on their board.
Change-Id: Ifb303989fdb67f7267002bd0425f3d050450ec93
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65545
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Unit tests had an unconditional dependency on libusb and this was
a) strictly speaking not needed, b) blocking one build system effort.
This patch is a temporary solution to unblock one build system effort,
specifically CB:63724. It creates a condition so that libusb is only
included when it is required, not always.
This workaround is based on the fact that at the moment only
2 lifecycle unit tests are using libusb symbols: dediprog and
raiden_debug.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=the following scenarios run tests successfully
1) dediprog and raiden_debug programmers enabled, libusb.h present
result:
all test run and pass
2) dediprog disabled, libusb.h present
result:
dediprog test skipped, all other tests run and pass
3) dediprog and raiden_debug both disabled,
libusb.h changed to libusbabcd.h
result:
dediprog and raiden_debug tests are skipped,
all other tests run and pass
Change-Id: Iec8a1826951fd6ae586e90fde1a55170e7de41a8
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65627
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
This patch creates individual files for each programmer's lifecycle
tests. Common functions that are reusable for all tests are
gathered in lifecycle.c. Each individual file needs to include
lifecycle.h
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: If2307699dcbb3a085b91a2dcd41156e6fd07f812
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65543
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Lifecycle functions will be used in all lifecycle tests and need to
be available by including lifecycle.h
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: Ic4e9defe16c535c9384c1304c1cad2f5b84294c9
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65542
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
New header file lifecycle.h need to gather all things shared among
lifecycle tests.
This is one step to the goal of splitting lifecycle tests into
separate per-programmer file.
BUG=b:237606255
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: I93d0db943d9c96e2c36e9f7dce5c885c959745a0
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65541
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Lifecycle tests had local struct declared with static keyword, but
static was not necessary for them. So, removing.
BUG=b:233816068
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: If844d07ec42b878bd0da8460655be45e865f089f
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65323
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joursoir <chat@joursoir.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
In commit a721181a08 dummyflasher became an opaque master too, and
now registers prog bus by default. This patch upgrades a dummy unit
test which uses all buses as programmer param, and adds a unit test
which covers specific use case for opaque programmer.
BUG=b:233816068
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: I61a5333b61ea84fb91c7f8310d52b64213c62f83
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/65236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Joursoir <chat@joursoir.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
hwaccess functions used to be static inline functions and needed
a special treatment so that they could be mocked for unit tests.
This has changed, see include/hwaccess_x86_io.h now the functions
are not static inline anymore, and it is possible to use regular
cmocka wraps.
Fixes https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/385
BUG=b:181803212
TEST=ninja test
Change-Id: Iafce071ea7ad5bcfdebbba968699d5743705f8e0
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64881
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Joursoir <chat@joursoir.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Spansion flash chips S25FL128L and S25FL256L use the WRSR instruction to
write more than 2 registers. So align SR2 and SR3 support: The current
FEATURE_WRSR_EXT is renamed to FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 and FEATURE_WRSR_EXT3
is added. Also, WRSR3 needs a separate flag now.
Verified that FEATURE_WRSR_EXT2 still works using the `dummy_flasher`.
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Change-Id: Ibdfc6eb3d2cfecbf8da0493d067031ddb079a094
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64746
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Projects using libflashrom like fwupd expect the user to wait for the
operation to complete. To avoid the user thinking the process has
"hung" or "got stuck" report back the progress complete of the erase,
write and read operations.
Add a new --progress flag to the CLI to report progress of operations.
Include a test for the dummy spi25 device.
TEST=./test_build.sh; ./flashrom -p lspcon_i2c_spi:bus=7 -r /dev/null --progress
Change-Id: I7197572bb7f19e3bdb2bde855d70a0f50fd3854c
Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/49643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
This fixes -Werror=unused-function when not all programmer tests are
build.
`run_basic_lifecycle` and `run_probe_lifecycle` need to have a prototype
to not throw a -Werror=unused-function if no programmer needs them.
Change-Id: I02880e73996b30df618738e86b8a52126fbe5b3b
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64224
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Part 2 of fixing -Wmissing-prototypes warnings. This patch adds
headers with function prototypes and includes the headers into
source files. This fixes the warnings like this:
warning: no previous prototype for ‘function_name’
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
This patch is needed to sync compiler warning options between meson
and makefile.
TEST=running the following produces no warnings:
meson setup --wipe (to clean build directory)
ninja test
Change-Id: Ia1ff22deb2354569f277649c6575ef2d5ffbb6e0
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63489
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Part 1 of fixing -Wmissing-prototypes warnings. This patch is
adding static to all functions which are actually static.
This fixes the warnings like this:
warning: no previous prototype for ‘function_name’
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
This patch is needed to sync compiler warning options between meson
and makefile.
TEST=running the following produces no warnings:
meson setup --wipe (to clean build directory)
ninja test
Change-Id: Ic54da5ac1b2a46f55e3e3bee4ed952bdf59e8444
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63571
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
With this change we add path and flag validation to many tests that do
not call open. Expected path is set to NULL, if the code indead calls
open then the assertion for non-NULL will make the test fail.
BUG=b:217629892,b:215255210
TEST=`ninja test`.
Change-Id: I892fa1ecee26ebce9640893edbb228fa9aa7b0b6
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Co-Author: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62320
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
