It is based on Joshua Roys' RE.
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-August/007504.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1408.
Tested-by: Márton Miklós
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
- retag it as OK (tested by Jonathan Kollasch when he wrote it)
http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/2106/
- add a line with identical pci ids but a different DMI pattern, so that EP-9NPA7I
is also matched. combining multiple boards in one line is problematic due to
print.c's detection of board enables - so dont bother for now.
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-June/006878.html
See previous commit for additional information.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1406.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Also, indentation fixes, e.g. due to conversion to msg_*, use ARRAY_SIZE
where possible, wrap overly long line, etc.
Compile-tested. There should be no functional changes.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1397.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
It's shorter to type, and we have less problems with the 80 column limit.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1396.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
P5N-E SLI, EP-8NPA7I and EP-9NPA7I all need at least this patch:
http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/2125/
the P5N-E also needs a board enable:
http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/3298/
mark the boards as not working until those are merged.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1382.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/2893/
lspci: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=494
only writing a backup file was tested, so mark it as untested.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1368.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Roys <roysjosh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
Tested reading, writing and verification, all worked fine.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1346.
Signed-off-by: Pawel Rozanski <rozie@poczta.onet.pl>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Tested-by: Melroy van den Berg
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-December/005642.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1327.
Based on reverse engineering by Michael Karcher.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Pijanka <maciej.pijanka@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Handle board-specific quirks in three phases:
1. Before Super I/O probing (e.g. blacklisting of some Super I/O probes,
or unhiding the Super I/O)
2. Before the laptop enforcement decision (e.g. whitelisting a laptop
for flashing)
3. After chipset enabling (all current board enables)
Implementation note: All entries in board_pciid_enables get an
additional phase parameter. Alternative variants (3 tables instead of 1)
also have their downsides, and I chose table bloat over table
multiplication).
With this patch, it should be possible to whitelist supported laptops
with a matching entry (phase P2) in board_pciid_enables which points to
a function setting laptop_ok=1. (In case DMI is broken, matching might
be a little bit more difficult, but it is still doable.)
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1294.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Flashrom currently only supports exactly one Super I/O or Embedded
Controller, and this means quite a few notebooks and a small subset of
desktop/server boards cannot be handled reliably and easily.
Allow detection and initialization of up to 3 Super I/O and/or EC chips.
WARNING! If a Super I/O or EC responds on multiple ports (0x2e and
0x4e), the code will do the wrong thing (namely, initialize the hardware
twice). I have no idea if we should handle such situations, and whether
we should ignore the second chip with identical ID or not. Initializing
the hardware twice for the IT87* family is _not_ a problem, but I don't
know how well IT85* can handle it (and whether IT85* would listen at
more than one port anyway).
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1289.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Thanks to Thomas Schneider for testing on a board with ITE IT87* SPI.
Test report (success) is here: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=379
Thanks to David Hendricks for testing on a Google Cr-48 laptop with
ITE IT85* EC SPI. Test report (success) is here:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-April/006275.html
Acked-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@google.com>
Only list the memory controller PCI IDs because the only other subsystem
mentioned is used by network and sound interfaces both of which can be
turned off in BIOS.
Tested on a board rev 1.85.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1273.
Signed-off-by: Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coreboot.org>
Gigabyte is not really helpful with their PCI IDs for us, the subsystem
IDs used just mean "gigabyte northbridge" and "gigabyte southbridge".
We should investigate whether autodetection of this board is causing
interference with other boards.
real version 2: Extend list of PCI IDs for nvidia southbridges.
flashrom -V: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=326
lspic: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=328
superiotool: http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=329
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1266.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
This patch fixes wrong escaping of %.
In print.c %%2b is correct instead of \%2b ("%%2b"=%2b=+)
In board_enable.c %d is correct instead of \%d.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1256.
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coreboot.org>
I found this via educated guessing and trial-and-error.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1239.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Details, lspci/superiotool/flashrom logs:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-October/005160.html
Also add the vendor website URL for this board.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1214.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
A lot of messages sent@flashrom.org just have "flashrom -V" as the subject.
Ask people to include more information in the subject line to make life
easier for developers/supporters.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1202.
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
This also adds (and marks as tested) a chipset-enable for the SiS 741.
All operations successfully tested on hardware.
lspci/superiotool:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-September/004710.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1192.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Reported by Konstantin <hc@comp.susu.ac.ru>
lspci (superiotool missing, doesn't matter for this patch)
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-September/004609.html
DMI is needed, as there are no usefull PCI IDs.
(no test of that board yet, thus marked as untested)
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1187.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
The board-enable is the same as for the ASUS A7V8X, i.e., it raises
GP51 on the ITE IT8703F. I verified using a multimeter that this
will raise both, WE# and TBL# on the flash chip.
All operations successfully tested on hardware.
Also renamed board_asus_a7v8x() to it8703f_gpio51_raise().
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1167.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Joshua Roys <roysjosh@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1163.
Signed-off-by: Tim ter Laak <timl@scintilla.utwente.nl>
Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
I does this by setting bits 3..2 of register 0x24 on the ITE IT8707F,
while keeping bit 3 of register 0x23 set while manipulating the first
register.
AFAIK, there is no public datasheet available for this super i/o chip, but
the above is how the vendor BIOS does it. Also, registers 0x23 and 0x24 seem
to have the same meaning as on the ITE IT8710F.
Matching on NB/SB.
Tested on a P4SC-E with SST 39SF020A flash. Probe, read, erase, write
all work.
lspci/superio output:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-July/004090.html
flashrom output:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004566.html
Many thanks to Reinder de Haan for help with reverse engineering this!
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1161.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Matching on NB/SB. Probe, read, erase and write all work.
lspci/superiotool output:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004461.html
I believe that this board enable also works for MSI BX Master (MS-6163
rev:3) and perhaps also for MSI MS-6163FC (MS-6163 rev:1) but these
boards have not been tested.
Test logs for MS-6163 (rev:2):
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-September/004704.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1160.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Match on SMBus and Audio.
lspci/superiotool/flashrom output:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-September/004689.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1159.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Roys <roysjosh@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Mikhnovets <alexander.mikhnovets@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
SiS 745 chipset + Winbond W83697HF and Winbond W49F002U flash. Probe, read,
erase and write all work.
Matching on "NB/SB" (they are integrated). Also mark SiS 745 chipset
as tested.
lspci/superiotool:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-September/004705.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1158.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
lspci/superiotool:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004436.html
This goes the safe route of adding a match for the P4P800 that does not
match the P4P800-E Deluxe which is already in. It seems quite likely that
the whole P4P800 family could use the same board enable with one generic
board enable match, though.
This match uses host bridge + audio, because all other IDs match the
P4P800-E Deluxe board, as reported in
http://www.e-monkeys.de/Everest-Bericht.txt
(no user feedback, commit as "untested")
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1157.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
lspci/superiotool:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004539.html
matching SMBus + Audio, because SMBus is the only core device with
usable IDs.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1156.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Marked as untested for now, as there was no response from the user.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1155.
Signed-off-by: Sergey A Lichack <shadowpilot34@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Many thanks to Michael Karcher for reverse engineering this.
lspci/superio output:
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-August/004475.html
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1146.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
This patch changes the intel_piix4_gpo_set() function to always check
the GENCFG and XBCS registers for the availability of the
requested GPO line before raising/lowering it and fails otherwise. It
makes no attempt to bypass the values in these configuration
registers.
The old flashrom code did consider it safe to reprogram (multiplexed)
GPO:s 22-26 without checking the value of the controlling register
(GENCFG). I do not really know why.
I have tested this patch on an Asus P2B-N (needs GPO18 low) and MSI
MS-6163 Pro (needs GPO14 high).
The information for these registers are from the Intel "82371AB
PCI-TO-ISA / IDE XCELERATOR (PIIX4)" datasheet available here:
http://www.intel.com/design/intarch/datashts/29056201.pdf
Corresponding to flashrom svn r1142.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Mattsson <vitplister@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
