If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS
specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there.
Handle these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a
specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips,
but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The
only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times
until they are added to flashchips.[ch].
Corresponding to flashrom svn r767.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
Vincent wrote: This patch provided help to debug the partial write on
ICH in descriptor mode.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r764.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Vincent S. Cojot <openlook@cojot.name>
With the multicommand infrastructure I introduced in r645, it became
possible to integrate ICH SPI preopcodes cleanly into the flashrom
design.
The new code checks for every opcode in a multicommand array if it is a
preopcode. If yes, it checks if the next opcode is associated with that
preopcode and in that case it simply runs the opcode because the correct
preopcode will be run automatically before the opcode.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r727.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: FENG Yu Ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
Example make commandline if you want only internal programmers:
make CONFIG_FT2232SPI=no CONFIG_SERPROG=no CONFIG_NIC3COM=no
CONFIG_SATASII=no CONFIG_DRKAISER=no CONFIG_DUMMY=no
Of course, all of the CONFIG_* symbols can be mixed and matched as
needed. CONFIG_FT2232SPI is special because even if it is enabled, make
will check if the headers are available and skip it otherwise.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r724.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
I decided to fill in the info for a
few chips to illustrate how this works both for uniform and non-uniform
sector sizes.
struct eraseblock{
int size; /* Eraseblock size */
int count; /* Number of contiguous blocks with that size */
};
struct eraseblock doesn't correspond with a single erase block, but with
a group of contiguous erase blocks having the same size.
Given a (top boot block) flash chip with the following weird, but
real-life structure:
top
16384
8192
8192
32768
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
bottom
we get the following encoding:
{65536,7},{32768,1},{8192,2},{16384,1}
Although the number of blocks is bigger than 4, the number of block
groups is only 4. If you ever add some flash chips with more than 4
contiguous block groups, the definition will not fit into the 4-member
array anymore and gcc will recognize that and error out. No undetected
overflow possible. In that case, you simply increase array size a bit.
For modern flash chips with uniform erase block size, you only need one
array member anyway.
Of course data types will need to be changed if you ever get flash chips
with more than 2^30 erase blocks, but even with the lowest known erase
granularity of 256 bytes, these flash chips will have to have a size of
a quarter Terabyte. I'm pretty confident we won't see such big EEPROMs
in the near future (or at least not attached in a way that makes
flashrom usable). For SPI chips, we even have a guaranteed safety factor
of 4096 over the maximum SPI chip size (which is 2^24). And if such a
big flash chip has uniform erase block size, you could even split it
among the 4 array members. If you change int count to unsigned int
count, the storable size doubles. So with a split and a slight change of
data type, the maximum ROM chip size is 2 Terabytes.
Since many chips have multiple block erase functions where the
eraseblock layout depends on the block erase function, this patch
couples the block erase functions with their eraseblock layouts.
struct block_eraser {
struct eraseblock{
unsigned int size; /* Eraseblock size */
unsigned int count; /* Number of contiguous blocks with that size */
} eraseblocks[NUM_ERASEREGIONS];
int (*block_erase) (struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int blockaddr, unsigned int blocklen);
} block_erasers[NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS];
Corresponding to flashrom svn r719.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
The __func__ variant is standardized in C99 and recommended to be
used instead of __FUNCTION__ in the gcc info page.
Only _very_ old versions of gcc did not know about __func__, but we've
been using both __func__ and __FUNCTION__ for a long while now, and
nobody complained about this, so all our users seem to use recent
enough compilers.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r711.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
We can't remove ft2232_spi.o from unconditional OBJS yet due to our
makefile structure (make features), but this patch adds #ifdefs around
all FT2232H code, so the net effect is the same.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r691.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Some SPI chip drivers and the generic 1-byte SPI chip write functions
didn't include the automatic erase present in other chip drivers.
Since the majority is definitely auto-erase, change the remaining
explicit-erase cases to be auto-erase as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r673.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carlos Arnau Perez <cemede@gmail.com>
If we only send an opcode and no additional data/address, the SPI
controller will read one byte too few from the chip. Basically, the
last byte of the chip response is discarded and will not end up in the
FIFO. It is unclear if the CS# line is set high too early as well. That
hardware bug is undocumented as of now, but I'm working with AMD to add
a detailed description of it to the errata.
Add loads of additional debugging to SB600/SB700 init.
Add explanatory comments for unintuitive code flow.
Thanks go to Uwe for testing quite a few iterations of the patch.
Kill the SB600 flash chip status register special case, which was a
somewhat misguided workaround for that hardware erratum.
Note for future added features in the SB600 SPI driver: It may be
possible to read up to 15 bytes of command response with overlapping
reads due to the ring buffer design of the FIFO if the command can be
repeated without ill effects. Same for skipping up to 7 bytes between
command and response.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r661.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
This makes visual inspection and grepping a lot harder than necessary.
Remove line breaks where appropriate. Some error messages should end up
on stderr instead of just being displayed in verbose mode.
Thanks to Maciej Pijanka for testing.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r660.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
This brings the SPI code in line with the generic programmer
infrastructure.
This patch is a reworked version of a patch by Jakob Bornecrantz.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r657.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r651.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested it on Epia-m700 worked okay.
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r650.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Jakob writes:
Tested it on my EPIA-m700 and it worked nice. Also double checked that
one of the changed functions actually ran.
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Once the ICH/VIA SPI driver is converted to multicommand, a lot of hacks
can disappear.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r647.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Some SPI opcodes need to be sent in direct succession after each other
without any chip deselect happening in between. A prominent example is
WREN (Write Enable) directly before PP (Page Program). Intel calls the
first opcode in such a row "preopcode".
Right now, we ignore the direct succession requirement completely and it
works pretty well because most onboard SPI masters have a timing or
heuristics which make the problem disappear.
The FT2232 SPI flasher is different. Since it is an external flasher,
timing is very different to what we can expect from onboard flashers and
this leads to failure at slow speeds.
This patch allows any function to submit multiple SPI commands in a
stream to any flasher. Support in the individual flashers isn't
implemented yet, so there is one generic function which passes the each
command in the stream one-by-one to the command functions of the
selected SPI flash driver.
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r645.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Since block erase functions do not know the block length (it's not
specified in any standard), block erase functions now get an additional
parameter blocklen. This enables flashrom to verify the erase result for
block erase functions at correct boundaries.
Tested by Uwe on SB600.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r630.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
FTDI support is autodetected during compilation.
Paul writes:
There are certainly possible improvements: The code has hard-coded
values for which interface of the ftdi chip to use (interface B was
chosen because libftdi seems to have trouble with A right now), what
clock rate use for the SPI interface (I've been running at 30Mhz, but
the patch sets it to 10Mhz), and possibly others. I think this means
that per-programmer options might be a good idea at some point.
Carl-Daniel writes:
There is one additional FIXME comment in the code, but AFAICS that
problem is not solvable with current libftdi.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r598.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fox <pgf@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
That means you can tell flashrom to read exactly bytes 12345-56789
(start 12345, length 44445) and it will not fetch a single byte more.
Uwe tested this on one LPC, one SPI, and one parallel flash board.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r596.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Flash.h not only contains function prototypes and general settings, it
also has a huge chunk of chip and vendor IDs in the middle.
Split them out into a separate flashchips.h and adjust #include wherever
needed.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r594.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
This was partly due to a design problem in the abstraction layer.
There should be exactly two different functions for reading SPI chips:
- memory mapped reads
- SPI command reads.
Each of them should be contained in a separate function, optionally
taking parameters where needed.
This patch solves the problems mentioned above, shortens the code and
makes the code logic a lot more obvious.
Since open-coding the min() function leads to errors, include it in this
patch as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r589.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Add external programmer delay functions so external programmers can
handle the delay on their own if needed.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r578.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Right now, the annotation only differentiates between SPI and non-SPI.
Anyone who knows more about a specific flash chip should feel free to
update it.
The existing flashbus variable was abused to denote the SPI controller
type. Use an aptly named variable for that purpose.
Once this patch is merged, the chipset/programmer init functions can set
supported flash chip types and flashrom can automatically select only
matching probe/read/erase/write functions. A side benefit of that will
be the elimination of the Winbond W29EE011 vs. AMIC A49LF040A conflict.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r556.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Every chip besides SPI and w39v080fa uses id1/id2 as local variable
names to store ID responses from the flash chip. This eases grepping a
lot. As a bonus, it also frees up some names to be used as parameters.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r551.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
Build-tested on 32bit x86.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r521.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Until the ICH SPI driver can handle preopcodes as standalone opcodes,
we should handle such special opcode failure gracefully on ICH and
compatible chipsets.
This fixes status register writes on almost all ICH+VIA SPI masters.
The fix is almost identical to r484, but this time it affects the EWSR
(Enable Write Status Register) opcode instead of the WREN (Write Enable)
opcode.
With the differentiated return codes introduced in r500, the workaround
is more precise this time. The old WREN workaround was updated as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r514.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: FENG Yu Ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cristi Magherusan <cristi.magherusan@net.utcluj.ro>
Does not support reading or writing the fake chip yet.
flashrom --programmer dummy
also enables the dummy SPI controller driver.
Testing the dummy SPI driver revealed a RDID debug printing bug in the
SPI core. Fix that as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r507.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Even if we don't tell the user about the areas the block locking bits
correspond to, printing a detailed list of which lock bits are set is a
definite improvement.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r505.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Sample output:
[...]
Probing for SST SST25VF032B, 4096 KB: RDID returned bf 25 4a.
probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 0xbf, id2 0x254a
Chip status register is 1c
Chip status register: Block Protect Write Disable (BPL) is not set
Chip status register: Auto Address Increment Programming (AAI) is not
set
Chip status register: Bit 5 / Block Protect 3 (BP3) is not set
Chip status register: Bit 4 / Block Protect 2 (BP2) is set
Chip status register: Bit 3 / Block Protect 1 (BP1) is set
Chip status register: Bit 2 / Block Protect 0 (BP0) is set
Chip status register: Write Enable Latch (WEL) is not set
Chip status register: Write In Progress (WIP/BUSY) is not set
Found chip "SST SST25VF032B" (4096 KB) at physical address 0xffc00000.
Acked-by: Cristi Magherusan <cristi.magherusan@net.utcluj.ro>
Among others, I have seen the following problems: - The SPI opcode is
not supported by the controller. ICH-style controllers exhibit this if
SPI config is locked down. - The address in in a prohibited area. This
can happen on ICH for any access (BBAR) and for writes in chipset write
protected areas. - There is no SPI controller.
Introduce separate error codes for unsupported opcode and prohibited
address.
Add the ability to adjust REMS and RES addresses to the minium supported
read address with the help of spi_get_valid_read_addr(). That function
needs to call SPI controller specific functions like reading BBAR on
ICH.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r500.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Change SPI architecture to handle 1-byte chunk chip writing differently
from 256-byte chunk chip writing.
Annotate SPI chip write functions with _256 or _1 suffix denoting the
number of bytes they write at maximum.
The 1-byte chunk writing is cut-n-pasted to different SPI drivers right
now. A later patch can move them to the generic spi_chip_write_1.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r485.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Until the ICH SPI driver can handle preopcodes as standalone opcodes,
we should handle such special opcode failure gracefully on ICH and
compatible chipsets.
This fixes chip erase on almost all ICH+VIA SPI masters.
Thanks to Ali Nadalizadeh for helping track down this bug!
Corresponding to flashrom svn r484.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
- Using a 4-bit index into an array with 8 elements leads to
out-of-bounds accesses. Use proper bit masking to fix this.
- Factor out common SST25 status register printing.
- Use the common SST25 status register printing for SST25VF080B.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r468.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r429 and coreboot v2 svn r4117.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
SST AAI is Auto Address Increment writing, a streamed write to the flash chip
where the first write command sets a starting address and following commands
simply append data. Unfortunately not supported by Winbond SPI masters.
From July 2008.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r407 and coreboot v2 svn r3913.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Developed and tested to work on Intel D201GLY in July 2008.
Tested by a helpful person on IRC whose name I've since forgotten. Sorry!
Corresponding to flashrom svn r404 and coreboot v2 svn r3910.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Ward Vandewege <ward@gnu.org>
This has been tested by Uwe Hermann on an RS690/SB600 board.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r351 and coreboot v2 svn r3779.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
- probe_spi_rdid with opcode 0x9f, usually 3 bytes ID
- probe_spi_res with opcode 0xab, usually 1 byte ID
We are missing the following probe function:
- probe_spi_rems with opcode 0x90, usually 2 bytes ID
RDID provides best specifity (manufacturer, device class and device) and
RES is supported by quite a few old chips. However, RES only returns one
byte and there are multiple flash chips with different sizes on the
market and all of them have the same RES ID.
REMS is from the same age as RES, but it provides a manufacturer and a
device ID. It is therefore on par with the probing for parallel flash
chips and specific enough.
The order in which chips should be detected is as follows:
1. RDID
2. REMS
3. RES
Corresponding to flashrom svn r349 and coreboot v2 svn r3775.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
The existing check in probe_spi_res() was right for SPI controllers
which support all commands, but may not exist. For controllers which
support only a subset of commands, it will fail in unexpected ways. Even
if a command is supported by the controller, it may be unavailable if
the controller is locked down.
The new logic checks if RDID could be issued and its return values
made sense (not 0xff 0xff 0xff). In that case, RES probing is not
performed. Otherwise, we try RES. There is one drawback: If RDID
returned unexpected values, we don't issue a RES probe. However, in that
case we should try to match RDID anyway.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r348 and coreboot v2 svn r3774.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: FENG yu ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
Although SPI itself does not have a mechanism to signal command failure,
the SPI host may be unable to send a given command over the wire due
to security or hardware limitations. The current code ignores these
mechanisms completely and simply assumes almost every command succeeds.
Complain if SPI command execution fails.
Since locked down Intel chipsets (like the one we had problems with
earlier) only allow a small subset of commands, find the common subset
of commands between the chipset and the ROM in the chip erase case. That
is accomplished by the new spi_chip_erase_60_c7() which can be used for
chips supporting both 0x60 and 0xc7 chip erase commands.
Both parts of the patch address problems seen in the real world. The
increased verbosity for the error case will help us diagnose and address
problems better.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r345 and coreboot v2 svn r3757.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Otherwise: Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Not all chips support all commands, so allow the implementer to select
the matching function. Fix a layering violation in ICH SPI code to be
less bad. Still not perfect, but the new code is shorter, more generic
and architecturally more sound.
TODO (in a separate patch): - move the generic sector erase code to
spi.c - decide which erase command to use based on info about the chip -
create a generic spi_erase_all_sectors function which calls the generic
sector erase function
Thanks to Stefan for reviewing and commenting.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r337 and coreboot v2 svn r3722.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Using block erase d8 as discussed with Peter Stuge
Corresponding to flashrom svn r333 and coreboot v2 svn r3707.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r326 and coreboot v2 svn r3669.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
While writing a new SPI driver I fixed some things in the SPI code:
All calls to spi_command() had unneccessary #define duplications, and in some
cases the read count define could theoretically become harmful because NULL was
passed for the read buffer. Avoid a crash, should someone change the #defines.
I also noticed that the only caller of spi_page_program() was the it87 driver,
and spi_page_program() could only call back into the it87 driver. Removed the
function for easier-to-follow code and made it8716f_spi_page_program() static.
The ichspi driver's static page functions are already static.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r302 and coreboot v2 svn r3418.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
At some point the flash bus will be part of struct flashchip.
Pardon me for pushing this in, but I think it is important to beware of further
decay and it will improve things for other developers in the short run.
Carl-Daniel, I will consider your suggestions in another patch. I want to keep
things from getting too much for now. The patch includes Rudolf's VIA SPI
changes though.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r285 and coreboot v2 svn r3401.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
